Graham Packaging Revenue, Growth & Competitor Profile

DBA GRAHAM PACKAGING PLASTIC PRODUCTS INC.

Company Profile & Annual Report for Graham Packaging

Access the complete profile.

Graham Packaging Fast Facts

Revenue	Over $500 million    See Exact Annual Revenue
Employees	Over 1,000Exact Company Size
Primary Industry	3261 Plastics Product Manufacturing
Address	700 Indian Springs Drive Suite 100 Lancaster, PA 17601

Note: Revenues for privately held companies are statistical evaluations.


Graham Packaging's Annual Report & Profile shows critical firmographic facts:

• What is the company's size? (Annual sales and employees)
  • Graham Packaging's annual revenues are Over $500 million (see exact revenue data)
• What industry is the company in?
  • Graham Packaging is classified as operating in the Plastics Product Manufacturing industry, NAICS Code 3261.

Graham Packaging Annual Revenue and Growth Rate

Graham Packaging	Revenue Est. ($ Million)	Growth Rate (%)	# Employees
2023	Over $500 million Details in Premium Report
2022
2021
2020
2019

1-Year Growth Rate: 3-Year Growth Rate (CAGR):

Note: Graham Packaging's revenues are gauged from an analysis of company filings.

Graham Packaging's Income Statement (based on Industry Averages)

Graham Packaging P&L	$ Millions
Revenue (Sales)
Cost of Goods Sold
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Advertising
Salaries and wages
Other Operating Expenses
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income
EBITDA
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes)
Net Profit

Trademark Applications

Trademark applications show the products and services that Graham Packaging is developing and marketing. Graham Packaging's new tradmarks suggest it is investing in R&D and marketing, while expanding into new products or markets. Trademarks may include brand names, product names, logos and slogans.

Trademark	Date
LAYERLOCK Plastic bottles sold empty for domestic or household use; plastic beverage containers sold empty for domestic or household use.	12/08/2023
ACCUSTRENGTH Plastic bottles sold empty for domestic or household use; plastic beverage containers sold empty for domestic or household use; non-metal aerosol bottles sold empty	02/02/2021
G GRAHAM PACKAGING Plastic bottles sold empty for domestic or household use; plastic beverage containers sold empty for domestic or household use; non-metal aerosol bottles sold empty	12/15/2020

See all trademarks and details in the Full Report.

Market Share of Graham Packaging's Largest Competitors

A competitive analysis shows these companies are in the same general field as Graham Packaging, even though they may not compete head-to-head. These are the largest companies by revenue. However, they may not have the largest market share in this industry if they have diversified into other business lines. The "Competition" section of a business plan or investment memorandum would start by analyzing the information about these companies. Competitive advantage comes from offering better pricing or superior products/service.

Company	Headquarters	Revenue ($ MM)
BERRY GLOBAL INC. FKA BERRY PLASTICS	Evansville, IN	100
DART CONTAINER OF MICHIGAN	Mason, MI	60
EPAC HOLDINGS	Delray Beach, FL	51
PACTIV EVERGREEN GROUP HOLDINGS	Lake Forest, IL	49
APTARGROUP	Crystal Lake, IL	49
AMCOR FLEXIBLES NORTH AMERICA	Oshkosh, WI	46
REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS	Lake Forest, IL	45
NOVOLEX HOLDINGS	Hartsville, SC	43
SEALED AIR	Charlotte, NC	38

Nearby Competitors

These companies are similar in business line and location to Graham Packaging. While some companies compete with neighboring businesses for customers, other companies may compete to attract skilled employees.

Company	Headquarters	Revenue ($ MM)
GRAHAM PACKAGING	Lancaster, PA	100
MXL INDUSTRIES	Lancaster, PA	2
NOVELTY MANUFACTURING	Lancaster, PA	2
KAMPEL ENTERPRISES	Wellsville, PA	1

Future Competition: Graham Packaging's Fastest Growing Competitors

These companies are in the same general field as Graham Packaging and are rapidly expanding. Companies may grow organically or through acquisition. In some cases apparently high growth rates may be caused by data that weren't available in previous years.

Company	Revenue ($ MM)