IncFact
Company Profiles: Revenue, Growth, Competition

Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Revenue, Growth & Competitor Profile

DBA CLINE CLOSE DYER, PLC
DBA POZNAK DYER KANAR GARCHOW PLC
DBA POZNAK DYER KANAR GARCHOW SCHEFSKY PLC
Last updated:

Company Profile & Annual Report for Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC

Access the complete profile.

Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Fast Facts

Revenue$1 - $10 million    See Exact Annual Revenue
Employees10 - 100Exact Company Size
Primary Industry54111 Law Firms
Address143 Mcdonald St
Midland, MI 48640

Note: Revenues for privately held companies are statistical evaluations.


Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC's Annual Report & Profile shows critical firmographic facts:
  • What is the company's size? (Annual sales and employees)
  • What industry is the company in?
    • Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC is classified as operating in the Law Firms industry, NAICS Code 54111.

Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Annual Revenue and Growth Rate

Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Revenue Est.
($ Million)
Growth Rate (%)# Employees
2023 $1 - $10 million

Details in Premium Report
2022
2021
2020
2019


1-Year Growth Rate:
3-Year Growth Rate (CAGR):
Premium Report

Note: Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC's revenues are gauged from an analysis of company filings.



Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC's Income Statement (based on Industry Averages)

Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC P&L$ Millions
Revenue (Sales) Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Premium Report
Cost of Goods Sold
Gross Profit

Operating Expenses
Advertising
Salaries and wages
Other Operating Expenses
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income
EBITDA
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes)
Net Profit
 


Market Share of Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC's Largest Competitors

A competitive analysis shows these companies are in the same general field as Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC, even though they may not compete head-to-head. These are the largest companies by revenue. However, they may not have the largest market share in this industry if they have diversified into other business lines. The "Competition" section of a business plan or investment memorandum would start by analyzing the information about these companies. Competitive advantage comes from offering better pricing or superior products/service.

Company HeadquartersRevenue ($ MM)
AUSTIN 316 FIDUCIARY LIMITEDOceanside, NY100 
LATHAM & WATKINSLos Angeles, CA54 
KIRKLAND & ELLISChicago, IL49 
GREENBERG TRAURIG P.A.Miami, FL42 
BAKER & MCKENZIEChicago, IL33 
FRAGOMEN DEL REY BERNSEN & LOEWYWashington D.c., DC32 
JONES DAYCleveland, OH29 
NORTH CAROLINA BAR FOUNDATIONCary, NC29 
SIDLEY AUSTINChicago, IL27 




Nearby Competitors

These companies are similar in business line and location to Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC. While some companies compete with neighboring businesses for customers, other companies may compete to attract skilled employees.

Company HeadquartersRevenue ($ MM)
ONEILL WALLACE & DOYLE PCSaginaw, MI100 
BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER PLCSaginaw, MI46 
JAY TRUCKS & ASSOCIATES P.C.Clare, MI28 
LAW OFFICE OF CAROL M. THOMASSaginaw, MI26 
SHINNERS & COOK P.C.Saginaw, MI21 
MASUD LABOR LAW GROUP P.C.Saginaw, MI21 




Future Competition: Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC's Fastest Growing Competitors

These companies are in the same general field as Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC and are rapidly expanding. Companies may grow organically or through acquisition. In some cases apparently high growth rates may be caused by data that weren't available in previous years.

CompanyRevenue ($ MM)
Poznak Dyer Kanar Schefsky Thompson PLC Competitors